enull null null null 1
- North America > United States > New York > Erie County > Buffalo (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.67)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Optimization (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Search (0.64)
- North America > United States > Texas > Brazos County > College Station (0.14)
- North America > United States > Hawaii > Honolulu County > Honolulu (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States > New Jersey > Mercer County > Princeton (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Alberta > Census Division No. 11 > Edmonton Metropolitan Region > Edmonton (0.04)
- Asia > Singapore > Central Region > Singapore (0.04)
Near-Optimality of Contrastive Divergence Algorithms
Glaser, Pierre, Huang, Kevin Han, Gretton, Arthur
We perform a non-asymptotic analysis of the contrastive divergence (CD) algorithm, a training method for unnormalized models. While prior work has established that (for exponential family distributions) the CD iterates asymptotically converge at an $O(n^{-1 / 3})$ rate to the true parameter of the data distribution, we show, under some regularity assumptions, that CD can achieve the parametric rate $O(n^{-1 / 2})$. Our analysis provides results for various data batching schemes, including the fully online and minibatch ones. We additionally show that CD can be near-optimal, in the sense that its asymptotic variance is close to the Cramér-Rao lower bound.
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States > New York > Erie County > Buffalo (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.67)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Optimization (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Search (0.64)
- North America > United States > Texas > Brazos County > College Station (0.14)
- North America > United States > Hawaii > Honolulu County > Honolulu (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States > Ohio (0.04)
- North America > United States > Minnesota (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- North America > United States > New Jersey > Mercer County > Princeton (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Alberta > Census Division No. 11 > Edmonton Metropolitan Region > Edmonton (0.04)
- Asia > Singapore > Central Region > Singapore (0.04)
Provably Personalized and Robust Federated Learning
Werner, Mariel, He, Lie, Jordan, Michael, Jaggi, Martin, Karimireddy, Sai Praneeth
Identifying clients with similar objectives and learning a model-per-cluster is an intuitive and interpretable approach to personalization in federated learning. However, doing so with provable and optimal guarantees has remained an open challenge. We formalize this problem as a stochastic optimization problem, achieving optimal convergence rates for a large class of loss functions. We propose simple iterative algorithms which identify clusters of similar clients and train a personalized model-per-cluster, using local client gradients and flexible constraints on the clusters. The convergence rates of our algorithms asymptotically match those obtained if we knew the true underlying clustering of the clients and are provably robust in the Byzantine setting where some fraction of the clients are malicious.
- North America > United States > California > Alameda County > Berkeley (0.04)
- Europe > Switzerland (0.04)
- Research Report (1.00)
- Workflow (0.93)